deep w/ NFD and he's repping top set

[wazz]

Ok, so that's a limp. I'd tend not to raise to isolate someone with those stats, which would be the main reason to raise here. If it was double-suited I'd be raising for value. Being deep isn't a good enough excuse to play the hand once it's been limpreraised, especially sandwiched, it's pretty dire by all accounts. Your absolute position is pretty bad and your relative position is even worse.

[Parlay Slow]

1. He probably does have top set
2. You have 3 hearts in your hand
3. You aren't completing the action
4. You won't get him to fold by repping some other scare card
5. You will sometimes get re-sucked out on

So I say fold.

[Hoopster81]

[ QUOTE ]
1. He probably does have top set
2. You have 3 hearts in your hand
3. You aren't completing the action
4. You won't get him to fold by repping some other scare card
5. You will sometimes get re-sucked out on

So I say fold.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah I folded

[Sly_Fox]

This looks like a easy fold. Glad to hear you did.

[pete fabrizio]

i doubt he has aces

[piiop]

He probly has 5678

[pete fabrizio]

[ QUOTE ]
He probly has 5678

[/ QUOTE ]

i don't know if you're kidding, but i definitely think that's a possibility. i don't think a 300+ bb stack is going to LRR aces while the other big stack is the raiser and has position on him all that often. maybe he would do that with double-suited AAJJ or something, but if his aces were THAT strong he would probably just raise them in the first place. plus there are only 2 aces left, so this is a parlay-type situation: compare the chances that he has the remaining 2 aces, and he didn't raise them first in, and he decided to LRR despite having a giant stack on his left, to the chances that he decided to play something else trickily and now thinks he can rep top set.