![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
We're talking about the AA, right (as this is the hand that is betting). It looks like someone suggests that the only hand that AA beats that will call is AK. However, KQ (which AA also has got beat) will surely also call a good amount of the time. [/ QUOTE ] It's unlikely that Gabe 3bet with KQ against a non-crazy UTG raiser. If he did, it's unlikely he would call the flop raise with it. So, while yes, from RW's perspective, KQ could call the river bet, it's not really in Gabe's range. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Oh, yeah, def harder to get to the river with KQ.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
i guess (to all the people saying its as easy as folding 2-7 when 5 people go allin in front of you) my question is, rw doesnt ever bluff on the river and you all have proof of this?
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] We're talking about the AA, right (as this is the hand that is betting). It looks like someone suggests that the only hand that AA beats that will call is AK. However, KQ (which AA also has got beat) will surely also call a good amount of the time. [/ QUOTE ] It's unlikely that Gabe 3bet with KQ against a non-crazy UTG raiser. If he did, it's unlikely he would call the flop raise with it. So, while yes, from RW's perspective, KQ could call the river bet, it's not really in Gabe's range. [/ QUOTE ] you realize williamson limp/called and thaler just open raised right? |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
you realize williamson limp/called and thaler just open raised right? [/ QUOTE ] I didn't, actually. What I get for watching it on a small screen. I'd have sworn he opened 'till I went back just now and watched again. Mea culpa. Disregard the KQ comments in that case. KQ is definitely in Gabe's range from RW's perspective. That makes the river bet make a lot more sense. Still a very reasonable river fold, just for slightly different reasons. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|