The myth of PS rakeback

[Rek]

[ QUOTE ]
Rek, you never replied to my earlier question. If you are in London, why are FT and Stars your only choices? SO many great bonus/rakeback schemes out there for those of us not in the US. Just curious.

[/ QUOTE ]

Believe it or not, I place more importance on quality of service and software regardless of what you might interpret from some of my posts.

I have played many sites (William Hill was one of my favorites) but have found FTP & Stars far far superior to the rest.

Choice of games and volumes of users are unrivaled. I did hope that WPEX was going to take off with their "no rake" structure and supported them for a while but it was a losing battle unfortunately.

Long answer to a short question.

I love Stars but do get frustrated when legitimate questions are posed and are derided by the PokerStars Appreciation Society (and no MicroBob I am not including you). It seems if you have a beef about "a,b or c" on Stars then people post replies about how good "x,y and z" is.

[Josem]

[ QUOTE ]
I love Stars but do get frustrated when legitimate questions are posed and are derided by the PokerStars Appreciation Society (and no MicroBob I am not including you). It seems if you have a beef about "a,b or c" on Stars then people post replies about how good "x,y and z" is.

[/ QUOTE ]

Links would be fascinating here...


Are you genuinely surprised that in a free-flowing discussion, with no moderation, that the discussion will flow from one topic to another?

[Rek]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I love Stars but do get frustrated when legitimate questions are posed and are derided by the PokerStars Appreciation Society (and no MicroBob I am not including you). It seems if you have a beef about "a,b or c" on Stars then people post replies about how good "x,y and z" is.

[/ QUOTE ]

Links would be fascinating here...


Are you genuinely surprised that in a free-flowing discussion, with no moderation, that the discussion will flow from one topic to another?

[/ QUOTE ]

I am not going looking for links but if you don't see almost every negative thread about PokerStars being highjacked by people saying "their software is far superior" and "try getting an answer as quickly from so and so site" then as I said earlier try taking off they rose tinted glasses.

[terrellk11]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Rek, you never replied to my earlier question. If you are in London, why are FT and Stars your only choices? SO many great bonus/rakeback schemes out there for those of us not in the US. Just curious.

[/ QUOTE ]

Believe it or not, I place more importance on quality of service and software regardless of what you might interpret from some of my posts.

I have played many sites (William Hill was one of my favorites) but have found FTP & Stars far far superior to the rest.

Choice of games and volumes of users are unrivaled. I did hope that WPEX was going to take off with their "no rake" structure and supported them for a while but it was a losing battle unfortunately.

Long answer to a short question.

I love Stars but do get frustrated when legitimate questions are posed and are derided by the PokerStars Appreciation Society (and no MicroBob I am not including you). It seems if you have a beef about "a,b or c" on Stars then people post replies about how good "x,y and z" is.

[/ QUOTE ]

I miss the Crypto network . . . was a goldmine.

[Abbaddabba]

Who cares which offers more?
They're both offer significantly less than other major sites.
Stars has a lot of strengths, but this is not one of them.

You can bitch about trivial differences in value between FTP rb and Stars FPP all you want, but there really isnt a big difference. It's like a wendy's enthusiast reeming out a mcdonalds fanboy in a discussion of fine dining.

[grouchie]

[ QUOTE ]

I miss the Crypto network . . . was a goldmine.

[/ QUOTE ]

QFMFT