cash out curse on Stars

[realjaydub]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
No [censored] sherlock...it was an example. You do know what an example is right?

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes. An example is a hypothetical situation which could be applicable to the situation at hand.

But your hypothetical isn't possible - it is a lie to say that PokerStars could've provided that algorithm to Cinetel for verification, 'cause they could not have.

You need to stop lying. You need to stop being a lying liar who lies.... or you need to admit that you were wrong and ignorant to provide that example.

This whole thread is littered with your lies and half-truths, so it is about time that you lifted your game and started to develop some integrity.


You continue to make serious criminal allegations against people, incredible slurs against people's livelihoods, and you provide no evidence to support them. That is a dirty, dirty, way of living a life.

[/ QUOTE ]

Josem, you are officially retarded.

I simply asked for proof that its legit, you couldn't give me any.

Keep douching on douche bag.

lol at criminal allegations...

oh, why couldn't they have sent Cigital an algorithm? LOL

How do you suppose Cigital tested their algorithm?

There's nothing criminal about rigging a poker site, sorry buddy.

There's nothing more dirty then a con artist, your gig is up.