![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
haha, im the opposite however, I feel that alot of plays will work on winning players and against the donks you can't make plays, just gotta go ABC most of the time, but I guess it depends on their style of weirdness ;p
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
haha, im the opposite however, I feel that alot of plays will work on winning players and against the donks you can't make plays, just gotta go ABC most of the time, but I guess it depends on their style of weirdness ;p [/ QUOTE ] that's what im saying. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
TNixon - you'#re absolutely right, that's exactly what I meant.
Obviously it is best to be playing against losing players rather than winning players, but what baffles me is when people post a marginal hand on about hand 15 and say "I was tempted to [call/shove] because Sharkscope shows he's a donk." Yeah, but some are donks because they'll try a huge bluff in a situation where you're clearly strong, some because they call way too much, some because they fold way too much, some because they can't lay down a nice looking hand etc. Sharkscope (unlike, for example, PT) doesn't tell you any of those things, just that they are a losing player. It just tells you that there are leaks to look out for. TNixon put it way better than I did, although I was being slightly vague on purpose! |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|