![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
The pic in the OP is *slightly* fake. It appears someone took the real image and changed darkness/contrast to make the clothing more seethrough than it really was. Pretty awesome job, too. [/ QUOTE ] Here are some of the originals (scaled down to prevent side-scrolling). The pic in the OP is clearly altered, but the spirit of the photograph was genuine. ![]()
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Am I the only person who thinks the unchanged pics are hotter?
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
No, I agree with you totally. The altered ones look great at first, but the originals have a sort of realism to them.
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
I don't give a crap about celebs, but I check out The Superficial every once in awhile because the guy who writes it is hilarious. Here is his short article on Alba from a few days ago.
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
I don't give a crap about celebs, but I check out The Superficial every once in awhile because the guy who writes it is hilarious. Here is his short article on Alba from a few days ago. [/ QUOTE ] Clicking on the link to the Kim Khardashian pics on that page could lead to serious respiratory problems for one's chicken. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I don't give a crap about celebs, but I check out The Superficial every once in awhile because the guy who writes it is hilarious. Here is his short article on Alba from a few days ago. [/ QUOTE ] Clicking on the link to the Kim Khardashian pics on that page could lead to serious respiratory problems for one's chicken. [/ QUOTE ]
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|