![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Devil's Advocate is out of here. That was fun.
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
There's a long chapter in Theory of Poker on that subject. I will understand it fully in maybe in 10 years but it says that if villains calls more than bets you should bet and bets or bluffs more you should ckeck. First that concept probably is not relevant for micro, second you need a specific read and third in micro almost all fall in the calling category anyway.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
There's a long chapter in Theory of Poker on that subject. I will understand it fully in maybe in 10 years but it says that if villains calls more than bets you should bet and bets or bluffs more you should ckeck. First that concept probably is not relevant for micro, second you need a specific read and third in micro almost all fall in the calling category anyway. [/ QUOTE ] This is false. The concept you're referring to works at all levels. If the conditions are right, you do one thing. If not, you do another. The fact that the hand is in the micros is just evidence towards whether the conditions are right or not. It is not related to whether the concept still holds water. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
It's actually more relevant at lower limits b/c of all the calling stations.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|