![]() |
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
Here is an interesting link regarding the number of stocks one should have in a portfolio:
The 15-Stock Diversification Myth The conclusion: [ QUOTE ] If the O’Neal data are generalizable to stocks, and I believe that they are, then even 100 stocks are not nearly enough to eliminate this very important source of financial risk. So, yes, you can eliminate nonsytematic portfolio risk, as defined by Modern Portfolio Theory, with a relatively few stocks. It’s just that nonsystematic risk is only a small part of the puzzle. Fifteen stocks is not enough. Thirty is not enough. Even 200 is not enough. The only way to truly minimize the risks of stock ownership is by owning the whole market. [/ QUOTE ] |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|