![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Nice rebound from yesterday. Still not sure if I've come to terms with the fact I'm betting on the WNBA yet.
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Very Nice I was a little late on the first pick, but got in on the S.A. game.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
We went 2-0 yesterday, to make up for the disappointing day beforehand. At this stage I think I am going to retire the old system. I think it is redundant at this stage, and I'm not comfortable following any of its picks unless the new system agrees. So we are retiring the old system at 35-25, 58.3%. IF there is a game the new system doesn't like, but you'd still like information about it and the old systems picks, please just ask. So with that, we are currently at:
6-3, 66.7% Tomorrow there is four games. Our system likes Detroit -3.5(60% of the time to cover), and Connecticut +7(70% of the time to cover). Thanks for the observations ECB - whether or not they factor in, it's still interesting to read them, and something to think about. Especially because there's things the bot just can't calculate [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] Good luck. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hey MrBlueNose,
Would you mind still listing the average margin of victory for the old system? For instance if Connecticut is +7 and you expect them to lose by 1 or 2 on average then I will usually throw a unit on the money line at +270 in addition to the spread line. If not thats cool too, but if you could thatd be great [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] -Mike |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
For sure, I'll look for 3-4 point differences and mention them. Tomorrow it lists Connecticut to lose by 1 point, and Minnesota to lose also by 1.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|