|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Where is [censored]? | |||
| Somebody who he banned has exacted revenge. |
   
|
36 | 22.78% |
| Banging a chick from myspace.com. |
  
|
57 | 36.08% |
| Found a new forum to terrorize. |
  
|
10 | 6.33% |
| Bad beat in poker, smashed his computer. |
  
|
7 | 4.43% |
| Bad beat in life, smashed his computer. |
  
|
34 | 21.52% |
| There's no on left that needs banning, his job is done. |
  
|
14 | 8.86% |
| Voters: 158. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
07-10-2007, 02:31 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: which is easier, full tilt or pstars?
[ QUOTE ]
At the 200NL level I've found Full Tilt to be way, way, way fishier than stars. [/ QUOTE ] There are fish at 200NL? I play 25NL on FT and all I run into are aggro 19/15s! Seriously though, I haven't played on Stars for a while but I remember when moving to FT (10NL) I noticed a generally higher level of aggression there. I guess a fish at 25NL is someone like 70/30 and a fish at 200NL is someone who just plays badly postflop, regardless of the stats. 
|
|
#2
07-10-2007, 08:19 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: which is easier, full tilt or pstars?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] At the 200NL level I've found Full Tilt to be way, way, way fishier than stars. [/ QUOTE ] There are fish at 200NL? I play 25NL on FT and all I run into are aggro 19/15s! Seriously though, I haven't played on Stars for a while but I remember when moving to FT (10NL) I noticed a generally higher level of aggression there. I guess a fish at 25NL is someone like 70/30 and a fish at 200NL is someone who just plays badly postflop, regardless of the stats. [/ QUOTE ] There are a good number of players who are awful both pre and postflop at the 200NL level. Granted, there are also more good regulars to deal with as well, but there's a surprising number of 50/30 and 40/2 players at this level, and a good number of the players with decent preflop stats are still pretty bad postflop.
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
