Official JUNE uNL **'`MICROBREW THREAD`'** LC/NC this way...

[Vyse]

[ QUOTE ]
im just saying there is no reason to call that if ure not on tilt...

[/ QUOTE ]

What the hell are you talking about? No, seriously. What is the objective of the game? Making money. The only question one should ask is whether it is +EV to call a THREE DOLLAR SHORT STACK's push, not to mention the pot odds and dead money we're getting. Dude, am I being leveled?

[ QUOTE ]
and i think i know a bit about optimally...seeing as im not the one constantly moving down in stakes

[/ QUOTE ]

A totally fallacious statement. Your whole backing on this is:

"There's no reason to call this all-in if you're not on tilt."

Superb logic there.

But because you're not in the midst of a 30K downswing/breakeven stretch, you know about optimally? Really? How so? How does that prove anything?

Logic must go over your head.

[C4LL4W4Y]

Dude that has nothing to do with anything - put the shortie on a range (yes, you have to include 79o because they show up with random [censored] all the time) and realize that AT beats it.

Moving down is something that takes a lot of [censored] balls to do, because you are admitting to yourself that you put the game above your own ego. Do everyone in here a favor and don't insult anyone for that.

[WHITEBOYAEHS]

the $3 was 1/3 a buyin... so ure saying that you call someones push for $18 in a nl 50 game after just opening the pot with ato?

[Vyse]

Yep, just like I'll only 3bet JJ+ at 100 NL.

[Supwithbates]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
im just saying there is no reason to call that if ure not on tilt...

[/ QUOTE ]

What the hell are you talking about? No, seriously. What is the objective of the game? Making money. The only question one should ask is whether it is +EV to call a THREE DOLLAR SHORT STACK's push, not to mention the pot odds and dead money we're getting. Dude, am I being leveled?

[ QUOTE ]
and i think i know a bit about optimally...seeing as im not the one constantly moving down in stakes

[/ QUOTE ]

A totally fallacious statement. Your whole backing on this is:

"There's no reason to call this all-in if you're not on tilt."

Superb logic there.

But because you're not in the midst of a 30K downswing/breakeven stretch, you know about optimally? Really? How so? How does that prove anything?

Logic must go over your head.

[/ QUOTE ]
your shove is awful with no read and someone left to act and expert with one.
I trust your judgment but am a bit surprised that you are continually being forced to move down. Are you tilting much?

[C4LL4W4Y]

If I open, get a caller, and someone shoves for 1/3 of a buyin, and I have any indication that he's as retarded as your standard 10NL donk, then yes, I call.

[Vyse]

[ QUOTE ]
If I open, get a caller, and someone shoves for 1/3 of a buyin, and I have any indication that he's as retarded as your standard 10NL donk, then yes, I call.

[/ QUOTE ]

Amen. Rofl, what do you people SERIOUSLY put a 10 NL $3 stack shove's range on?

[Supwithbates]

[ QUOTE ]
the $3 was 1/3 a buyin... so ure saying that you call someones push for $18 in a nl 50 game after just opening the pot with ato?

[/ QUOTE ]
are you seriously trying to make this comparison?

[WHITEBOYAEHS]

so supwithbates ....you agree with me?

[WHITEBOYAEHS]

is it not the same thing? i know its a different level but its the same hands and math and [censored] lol