Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Poker Theory

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #5  
Old 05-22-2007, 07:11 AM
El_Hombre_Grande El_Hombre_Grande is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: On another hopeless bluff.
Posts: 1,091
Default Re: \"Small logical errors\" in Sklansky hand rankings?

You are missing the point. While 53s most certainly does dominate 43s, the hand ranking ARE NOT heads up hand rankings, they reflect playability in a full ring 10-20 LHE game. Thus neither hand has any highcard showdown value (the only reason domination matters), and 43 more often leads to straights or open ended draws that can be semi-bluffed.

If there is a weakness to the hand rankings, I think that it is that they assume more multiway action than is currently prevalent in common online games, where VPIPs are quite low compared to their live counterparts. In any event, the author points out how to adjust the tables for tighter and more aggressive games, namely by dropping hands that need many opponents and cheap flops. Thus to call it a weakness is a stretch.
Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.