|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: KQo | |||
| raise |
   
|
38 | 71.70% |
| fold |
  
|
11 | 20.75% |
| call |
  
|
4 | 7.55% |
| Voters: 53. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
05-10-2007, 01:09 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL Bots on Full Tilt
A few thoughts
1. Assuming his story is 100% true, isn't this repeated and flagrant violation of the unofficial "1 player to a hand" rule? Obviously online such a rule is informal and having a friend at your PC for a hand or two every now and then is standard, but this is willful and repeated violation of it? Uh? 2. No NL system can be so precise to account for all scenarios, to the point where 35 people can all memorize and utilize it. NL is way too dynamic. There are too many factors. The only thing that would make sense is either 1 person watches all hands and makes all key decisiosn OR there is outside software aid. AKA a bot which just tells the human player what to do 3. The whole story just stinks to high heaven. We're supposed to believe that a player will sit down and memorize a system to make X amount per hour, but then only take a cut of that himself? After you memorize the "system" why not just leave and go make the full amount, without giving the house it's cut? 
|
|
#2
05-10-2007, 01:10 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NL Bots on Full Tilt
myturn2raise, i stated that in a previous post, saying people should accept they might be playing against more than 1 person.
|
|
#3
05-10-2007, 01:18 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NL Bots on Full Tilt
[ QUOTE ]
1. Assuming his story is 100% true, isn't this repeated and flagrant violation of the unofficial "1 player to a hand" rule? Obviously online such a rule is informal and having a friend at your PC for a hand or two every now and then is standard, but this is willful and repeated violation of it? Uh? [/ QUOTE ] Is this actually against the T&C to begin with? I hear people throw the "ought to be", and now "only if it occurs constantly" [ QUOTE ] 2. No NL system can be so precise to account for all scenarios, to the point where 35 people can all memorize and utilize it. NL is way too dynamic. [/ QUOTE ] It's not 35 players. The number 35 is just the accounts that got frozen due to having transfers. As others have said, this is very possible (trading, rb, sidebets, etc) [ QUOTE ] 3. The whole story just stinks to high heaven. We're supposed to believe that a player will sit down and memorize a system to make X amount per hour, but then only take a cut of that himself? After you memorize the "system" why not just leave and go make the full amount, without giving the house it's cut? [/ QUOTE ] Is this actually happening? As I understand it it's X guys just sharing their wins/losses to even out variance.
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
