SHIP I........hmmm.....wait a second

[Clayton]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
this is a ridiculously easy fold and anyone here that says call is a bad, tagfish player

[/ QUOTE ]

Clayton, quit being retarded. In no way could this hand ever be considered a "ridiculously easy fold." If you want to argue it's a fold, then fine, but I disagree (mainly because all we know about this guy are three little numbers with no sample size that, for me, don't mean he's so good and solid that he can ONLY have the few hands that beat you).

ugh, big laydown threads sucks.

[/ QUOTE ]

i should have conveyed more sarcasm on the bad tagfish part (ie [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]), but for me this is a very easy laydown given he is tight and passiveish.

and fwiw i like your argument on the three little numbers thing, but you're basically going to need thousands and thousands of hands to get a further idea, and we unfortunately on pokerstars have to operate on more limited samples.

[bilbo-san]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
this is a ridiculously easy fold and anyone here that says call is a bad, tagfish player

[/ QUOTE ]

Clayton, quit being retarded. In no way could this hand ever be considered a "ridiculously easy fold." If you want to argue it's a fold, then fine, but I disagree (mainly because all we know about this guy are three little numbers with no sample size that, for me, don't mean he's so good and solid that he can ONLY have the few hands that beat you).

ugh, big laydown threads sucks.

[/ QUOTE ]

i should have conveyed more sarcasm on the bad tagfish part (ie [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]), but for me this is a very easy laydown given he is tight and passiveish.

and fwiw i like your argument on the three little numbers thing, but you're basically going to need thousands and thousands of hands to get a further idea, and we unfortunately on pokerstars have to operate on more limited samples.

[/ QUOTE ]

So you are basically saying that small sample size-based reads > Bayes Theorem?

I disagree.

[Clayton]

bayes was a weak passive nit, and probably was SB and scooped hero's money with 76clubs

i would like to hear results since im abt to sleep

[Bukem_]

[ QUOTE ]
haha who ever considers folding sets unless the board is extremely coordinated(IE 789h) for 100bbs. You nit....

[/ QUOTE ]

lol.

I fold.

[Casper05]

I'm in the group that that thinks this is a fold but can't make it at the table.

Clayton- 555 is a call, right?

[Clayton]

yeah, i pretty much never fold 2nd set on 854dd board for any amount ever, even if its live and villain is 75 years old

[Zagga]

You get direct odds to boat up here...

[Casper05]

yes you do, as does villian

[yad]

today i was playing kinda aggro and i had AK and this guy who was 11/5/2 over about 600 hands shoved over my reraise preflop. i was like yo i should fold but then i said wait up i never fold ak preflop so i called and he had j7s, ship the moneys yo. except oops he hit trip 7s on the flop.

[pdoran10]

[ QUOTE ]
this is a ridiculously easy fold and anyone here that says call is a bad, tagfish player

[/ QUOTE ]
edit: clayton, if this was vs. u im sure i would stack of for no good reason [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img].