|
|
#471
05-14-2005, 01:31 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OFFICIAL YANKEES 2005 WORLD SERIES CHAMPIONS OR BUST THREAD
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Like they've owned him in his outing against us this year? The past is the past. [/ QUOTE ] Okay, so you can never cite the Yankees' 26 world series again. [/ QUOTE ] If I can't cite that then you can't cite 2004. |
|
#472
05-14-2005, 01:31 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: OFFICIAL YANKEES 2005 WORLD SERIES CHAMPIONS OR BUST THREAD
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Like they've owned him in his outing against us this year? The past is the past. [/ QUOTE ] Okay, so you can never cite the Yankees' 26 world series again. [/ QUOTE ] If I can't cite that then you can't cite 2004. [/ QUOTE ] Deal. |
|
#473
05-14-2005, 01:32 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: OFFICIAL YANKEES 2005 WORLD SERIES CHAMPIONS OR BUST THREAD
overrated? I dunno man, he seems like a pretty good groundball pitcher, I think maybe he is overrated in the regards that really all closers are overrated.
|
|
#475
05-14-2005, 01:33 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: OFFICIAL YANKEES 2005 WORLD SERIES CHAMPIONS OR BUST THREAD
[ QUOTE ]
overrated? I dunno man, he seems like a pretty good groundball pitcher, I think maybe he is overrated in the regards that really all closers are overrated. [/ QUOTE ] Mo is not overrated. Foulke can't hold a candle to Mo, and he never will be able to. The jury is still out on Gagne. |
|
#476
05-14-2005, 01:34 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: OFFICIAL YANKEES 2005 WORLD SERIES CHAMPIONS OR BUST THREAD
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Like they've owned him in his outing against us this year? The past is the past. [/ QUOTE ] Okay, so you can never cite the Yankees' 26 world series again. [/ QUOTE ] If I can't cite that then you can't cite 2004. [/ QUOTE ] Deal. [/ QUOTE ]what?????? The Yankees have pwned for 26 WS, the sox have won what, 2 or 3? Of course you can cite that, but citing one game in particular, is like citing winning once with 7-2o, it means literally nothing. |
|
#477
05-14-2005, 01:34 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: OFFICIAL YANKEES 2005 WORLD SERIES CHAMPIONS OR BUST THREAD
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Like they've owned him in his outing against us this year? The past is the past. [/ QUOTE ] Okay, so you can never cite the Yankees' 26 world series again. [/ QUOTE ] If I can't cite that then you can't cite 2004. [/ QUOTE ] Deal. [/ QUOTE ] I wasn't offering a deal. I was simply pointing out the possible problems. The Yankees have been consistently awesome for 85+ years. The Sox have one World Series title to show for it. They've blown many postseason opportunities. |
|
#478
05-14-2005, 01:35 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: OFFICIAL YANKEES 2005 WORLD SERIES CHAMPIONS OR BUST THREAD
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Like they've owned him in his outing against us this year? The past is the past. [/ QUOTE ] Okay, so you can never cite the Yankees' 26 world series again. [/ QUOTE ] If I can't cite that then you can't cite 2004. [/ QUOTE ] Deal. [/ QUOTE ]what?????? The Yankees have pwned for 26 WS, the sox have won what, 2 or 3? Of course you can cite that, but citing one game in particular, is like citing winning once with 7-2o, it means literally nothing. [/ QUOTE ] He's the one who agreed to the deal, I knew that he had much more leveraged and I pwned him. |
|
#479
05-14-2005, 01:35 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: OFFICIAL YANKEES 2005 WORLD SERIES CHAMPIONS OR BUST THREAD
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] overrated? I dunno man, he seems like a pretty good groundball pitcher, I think maybe he is overrated in the regards that really all closers are overrated. [/ QUOTE ] Mo is not overrated. Foulke can't hold a candle to Mo, and he never will be able to. The jury is still out on Gagne. [/ QUOTE ]well yeah there are a few standouts, but for the most part, I think most closers are overrated. I mean, big deal, you pitched one scoreless inning. |
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
