![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I would adjust by finding a SNG that pays out 100% en totale.
50+30+10 =90 |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
I would adjust by finding a SNG that pays out 100% en totale. 50+30+10 =90 [/ QUOTE ] I suppose I could clarify that it's like a buy-in for 9+1 or 10 total with 10 players. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
So its more like 55%/33%/11%
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
So its more like 55%/33%/11% [/ QUOTE ] Yes. And if anyone's had any experience with a structure like this before (although from the sound of it I'm guessing not), do other players tend to wait around for 3rd like in a 50-30-20 structure or do they gamble it up a bit more when there's 4 players left? |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Its probably similar, people want to get money (even if its just breakeven) so there is still a bubble at 4 players. You can probably be aggressive at the 3 person profit bubble since they won't want to get 3rd either.
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
The bubble isn't nearly as important.
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Push less/call more 4+ handed. Push more/call less 3-handed
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|