Official Party Regulars Thread

[tufat23]

[ QUOTE ]
Ok i emailed party and got them to block my chat for 2 weeks, which i will probably ask them to extend.

[/ QUOTE ]


no more complaining that they havent given me a fold button?

[FionnMac]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Ok i emailed party and got them to block my chat for 2 weeks, which i will probably ask them to extend.

[/ QUOTE ]


no more complaining that they havent given me a fold button?

[/ QUOTE ]

i'll just pm you if i need to berate you ok?

[Kristian]

Does anybody know why the high stakes tables are full ring only?

[stigmata]

[ QUOTE ]
Does anybody know why the high stakes tables are full ring only?

[/ QUOTE ]

idk, but it's allways been a bit of a tradition with party that the "big game" is generally full ring only. Presumably something to do with it being not quite so variance-crazy.

[bigt439]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Does anybody know why the high stakes tables are full ring only?

[/ QUOTE ]

idk, but it's allways been a bit of a tradition with party that the "big game" is generally full ring only. Presumably something to do with it being not quite so variance-crazy.

[/ QUOTE ]

you know what, at first i really found it to be annoying, but the more i play 25/50, the more i realize that there are significant advantages to having fish play full ring. alot of bad players dont realize the difference between full ring and 6max and are way too loose from early position. they also misinterpret your range for ep raises and it just results in the fish playing even worse.

but yeh, the variance argument is probably the biggest reason why party doesnt go to 6max there... honestly i think im on board with that argument too. you dont want the fish going broke...

now if theyd just stop raking so god damn much.