Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Two Plus Two > Special Sklansky Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-10-2007, 05:45 AM
LaMbaL LaMbaL is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 108
Default Re: Common No Limit Situation

I look at it this way: This is a hand we'd normally want to raise, but given the circumstances (many players left behind, BB showing strength) raising is imo too risky here.

There is a good chance that our hand is good here, and the chance of someone reraising behind us is reasonably small(!), so calling seems preferable over folding. Sure, calling will allow players behind us with draws to stay in the pot, but under the circumstances we do not have the position to stop them from doing so.

Also, if we get some more callers behind, we'll be offered great odds (6/24 and rising) and the pot will be 'locked', so unless someone hits it is likely that noone will attempt to steal the pot. Therefore, imo we can call with this hand that still has a decent chance of being the best hand, and reevaluate it to any future action.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-10-2007, 04:06 PM
Dromar Dromar is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: All-in...
Posts: 995
Default Re: Common No Limit Situation

[ QUOTE ]
Sure, calling will allow players behind us with draws to stay in the pot, but under the circumstances we do not have the position to stop them from doing so.

[/ QUOTE ]

We have the perfect position to do so. Immediate action right after the initial bettor. Raising here will force them to fold for the reasons I explained in one of my earlier posts.

[ QUOTE ]
Also, if we get some more callers behind, we'll be offered great odds (6/24 and rising) and the pot will be 'locked', so unless someone hits it is likely that noone will attempt to steal the pot.

[/ QUOTE ]

Your "no steal" comment is good, but our odds aren't really getting better. If we let the opponents behind us make a profitable call, we're losing money (via FTP). So, while our odds are getting better, we're ending up with less money. Those callers behind aren't just donating to the pot, they've got chances to win.

[ QUOTE ]
Therefore, imo we can call with this hand that still has a decent chance of being the best hand, and reevaluate it to any future action.

[/ QUOTE ]

Normally I like the "call and reevaluate" line, but I think it's even more important that we get HU here (if possible). Obviously, if there's a monster behind us, we're dropping the hand on the flop, and raising costs us more money in these instances. But these instances aren't common, and definitely aren't as common as the instances when calling would result in giving a player behind us a very profitable opportunity at our own expense.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-10-2007, 04:16 PM
thatpfunk thatpfunk is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: sandy eggo
Posts: 5,784
Default Re: Common No Limit Situation

im guessing the people saying fold have never played live. generally good live 25-50 = avg 2-4 (mayyyybe) online.

people constantly do [censored] [censored] live.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.