![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
People act like calling on the flop commits you to calling most of the times on the turn and river. Does it? [/ QUOTE ] No but it gives away too much information. Or are there any other hands you'd play this way if you are straightforward and tight? |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
This is a reverse implied odds situation. Raising is problematic because there are several players to act behind us and if one of them wakes up with a hand we're in trouble. Even if one of the 3 players with position on us flat calls the $1800, we can't like our hand very much and will likely have to give up on the turn. Easy fold with little money invested, poor relative position, and a hand with little chance of improvement if beaten.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
This is a reverse implied odds situation. Raising is problematic because there are several players to act behind us and if one of them wakes up with a hand we're in trouble. Even if one of the 3 players with position on us flat calls the $1800, we can't like our hand very much and will likely have to give up on the turn. Easy fold with little money invested, poor relative position, and a hand with little chance of improvement if beaten. [/ QUOTE ] This is what I have been saying. But it appears that a lot of what people have been saying seems to apply to a heads up vs. BB scenario. Four other opponents increases the likelyhood of all those other bad hands. There could even be a guy with AK and he's probably not exactly thrilled either unless he has something suited happening. I remember a segment on TV where they asked poker pros what hands they don't like playing and AQ came up a lot. Actually, even Doyle Brunson has commented on how much can be lost on that hand. And I do believe this is good example of such a situation. With no flush or straight hopes you are drawing to 2 outs for trips and 3 outs for two pair, both of which may not even be good enough. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|