![]() |
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
Keyser and all other in "spew" camp: Heres my logic... [ QUOTE ] This bet tells me he usually has one of three things: 1. the goods (pay me!), 2. a flush draw(slow down!) 3.a mid pair(do you have AA?, i'll go away). [/ QUOTE ] Also this play will get people to pay me off lighter if it does not work out. Its obviously not a standard line, and thats why most of you just deem it as spew. Honestly if I posted this in msnl most would say its- occasionally fine. I understand ssnl is different but given conditions this is not "complete spew". Just trying to encourage ssnl to think beyond the power of your own hand. I have played much higher which isnt a brag but just trying to show you a nonstandard line that is much more common at higher stakes but can still occasionally work in ssnl under right conditions. Food for thought. Flame away. [/ QUOTE ] sure, "sometimes" it's fine, like anything else in poker. When I say "complete spew" I don't necessarily mean that it is 100% a horrible play at all times. ok, semantics aside, I think this is a poor spot to bluff because it's basically a dark-tunnel bluff. Like you really have no idea what your opponent has and you're just praying he doesn't have something. I'd prefer for a bluff to develop more organically is all I'm saying. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|