![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Would you want the seat to your left to have 100,000 chips just being blinded off in a WSOP event wi | |||
| Yes, It adds to my expected value in the tournament. |
|
21 | 91.30% |
| No, it puts me at a disadvantage. |
|
2 | 8.70% |
| Voters: 23. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
muddywater on CR says I should avoid Party BBJ tables, because $0.50 extra rake per pot will build up quickly and it's just not +EV. Any thoughts?
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
muddywater on CR says I should avoid Party BBJ tables, because $0.50 extra rake per pot will build up quickly and it's just not +EV. Any thoughts? [/ QUOTE ] When the jackpot is above a certain level it becomes EV+ to play. Around $150k |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
muddywater on CR says I should avoid Party BBJ tables, because $0.50 extra rake per pot will build up quickly and it's just not +EV. Any thoughts? [/ QUOTE ] Depends on your willing to embrace variance. On a 6max $100NL table its +EV when the BBJ is above $250000. A few days ago the BBJ was around 700k, which meant every hand had a +EV of about $0.08 for jackpot value alone (on average, the extra rake costs about $0.03 per hand). On the other hand, the variance on the BBJ is ultra-huge: you must hit it to make it profitable and that might happen once in a lifetime if you're lucky. It doesn't take too much bad luck to be paying thousands in BBJ rake and never hitting it. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Play limit if you want to hit BBJ
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|