Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Internet Gambling > Internet Gambling

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-28-2007, 05:51 PM
Hannibal Hannibal is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 98
Default Re: Soft competition: Stars vs. FTP vs. Absolute?

I have to say that I have been playing on FT since Party went down. I recently switch to UB for the points promo as was REALLY surprise at the action. I used to play on UB a couple years ago and it was really tight...but now, maybe it's just me, but the place has a bunch of maniacs.

Having said that..if I was chosing between FT and AP for rakeback...it would be a no brainerr...FT all the way.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-28-2007, 05:57 PM
CasperW CasperW is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 64
Default Re: Soft competition: Stars vs. FTP vs. Absolute?

As I've said before, AP customer service are a bunch of morons (when they eventually do reply to your email). Take that into consideration.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-28-2007, 05:59 PM
Svarog Svarog is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 225
Default Re: Soft competition: Stars vs. FTP vs. Absolute?

[ QUOTE ]

Having said that..if I was chosing between FT and AP for rakeback...it would be a no brainerr...FT all the way.

[/ QUOTE ]

Thanks... I am definitely leaning towards FT if I can deposit with a credit card (which, according to another post, you can).

Maybe I should give UB another shot -- but seriously, how can people stand the graphics? I guess I haven't looked for a while, but do you still have to mouse over the chips to see the bet amounts displayed?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-28-2007, 06:01 PM
Hannibal Hannibal is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 98
Default Re: Soft competition: Stars vs. FTP vs. Absolute?

[ QUOTE ]
Maybe I should give UB another shot -- but seriously, how can people stand the graphics? I guess I haven't looked for a while, but do you still have to mouse over the chips to see the bet amounts displayed?

[/ QUOTE ]

No...you just have to go to options and change the settings.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-28-2007, 07:09 PM
Push_Fold Push_Fold is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Making pointless posts
Posts: 1,628
Default Re: Soft competition: Stars vs. FTP vs. Absolute?

At the low limits I think they are all pretty much the same. If not, you have some serious leaks in your game.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-28-2007, 09:46 PM
pokerchap pokerchap is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: selling cake money FO FREE
Posts: 2,345
Default Re: Soft competition: Stars vs. FTP vs. Absolute?

the low limits are not the same at all. Obviously they should all be beatable if your a decent player, but they are definitley different. Full Tilt is definitley the hardest site. Hands down. AP, UB, and Bodog are the softest IMO
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-28-2007, 09:54 PM
5thStreetHog 5thStreetHog is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,234
Default Re: Soft competition: Stars vs. FTP vs. Absolute?

[ QUOTE ]
the low limits are not the same at all. Obviously they should all be beatable if your a decent player, but they are definitley different. Full Tilt is definitley the hardest site. Hands down. AP, UB, and Bodog are the softest IMO

[/ QUOTE ]Mehhh,why is FT tougher than UB?? What evidence would lead you to make such a statement? The numbers and reality would suggest otherwise.Tilt is the hardest cause thats the site your on??? Silly
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-28-2007, 09:58 PM
Hannibal Hannibal is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 98
Default Re: Soft competition: Stars vs. FTP vs. Absolute?

[ QUOTE ]
Mehhh,why is FT tougher than UB?? What evidence would lead you to make such a statement? The numbers and reality would suggest otherwise.Tilt is the hardest cause thats the site your on??? Silly

[/ QUOTE ]

Having just moved over to UB after being on FT for a year...I have to say I have found A LOT more action at UB. I am not saying that because I running hot....just seems like there are more maniacs on UB. On UB seems like the only two bets are potsized or all in. Plays alot like Party used to. This didn't used to be the case the last time I was on UB. Just my opinion though....
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-28-2007, 10:09 PM
dostofan dostofan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 99
Default Re: Soft competition: Stars vs. FTP vs. Absolute?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

Having said that..if I was chosing between FT and AP for rakeback...it would be a no brainerr...FT all the way.

[/ QUOTE ]




Thanks... I am definitely leaning towards FT if I can deposit with a credit card (which, according to another post, you can).

Maybe I should give UB another shot -- but seriously, how can people stand the graphics? I guess I haven't looked for a while, but do you still have to mouse over the chips to see the bet amounts displayed?

[/ QUOTE ]

Funny, because when I first started playing UB I hated the graphics too. But I stuck with it and now I find the graphics/interface at other sites boring and slow. Like anything in life, it's a mattter of getting used to it.

But really, what's more important, that you like the graphics or having a good rewards system and a good player pool. If you're a US player the combination of bonus and the weekly cash for points program (plus rakeback if you can get it) is just about unbeatable. As for the players, it's a very mixed pool. At the levels I play the average player is aggresive, but that doesn't mean their good. Actually, you often see laggy players donking their chips away. I don't play FT, but using BW's game quality grid UB comes out way ahead.

And, it's been said over and over, but let me say it once more, UB's interface is the fastest around. I can get more hands in per hour here than anywhere else. Also, the donks like the fast/non-thinking game.

Just my 2c.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-28-2007, 10:19 PM
5thStreetHog 5thStreetHog is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,234
Default Re: Soft competition: Stars vs. FTP vs. Absolute?

Well stated Dost,you make a good point about the software.To complain about software thats faster than most any room out there because of the graphics or whatever is not a very good line.I agree the interface can take some getting used to if your new to the site,but its all about the deal speed bottom line in software and UB is fast.Of course,i played AP in Nov,Dec so any software was like jumping in a race car after busting out some hands there.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.