![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[/ QUOTE ] 4 In the US, judges determine law, juries determine facts. whether poker is more chance than anything else is a question of fact. [/ QUOTE ] I agree with the first statement and feel that the that the second statement cannot be true. Essentially, you are saying that a jury decides whether an activity is prohibited by law or not. IMHO if any court has allowed a jury to make this determination as a matter of fact, then that court has committed reversible error. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
There is a point of law that lets judges decide facts when there can be no reasonable dispute about the matter. If there can be a dispute about the facts, a jury decides the facts.
When a statute says its a crime to drive "recklessly" a defendant can argue to the jury that he wasnt reckless even if he otherwise admits that he was going 70 in a 25 zone while talking on his cell phone. Not that I would want to be that defendant's lawyer, but he can make the argument. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|