|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Choose wisely | |||
| Pozzed |
   
|
8 | 25.00% |
| Pwned |
  
|
24 | 75.00% |
| Voters: 32. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#2
02-11-2007, 09:20 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OT: STTF [censored] thread, February
Another thing in cash is to really watch your opponents. I had a couple of players in one game the other night who had fairly similar loose passive stats and played somewhat similarly preflop, but postflop they were almost exactly the opposite.
On HUD, even looking at a lot of stats they looked the same, but one guy was betting whenever he had a hand and never bluffing or semi-bluffing and the other guy slowplayed everything, but bluffed fairly often. |
|
#3
02-11-2007, 11:06 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: OT: STTF [censored] thread, February
[ QUOTE ]
Another thing in cash is to really watch your opponents. I had a couple of players in one game the other night who had fairly similar loose passive stats and played somewhat similarly preflop, but postflop they were almost exactly the opposite. On HUD, even looking at a lot of stats they looked the same, but one guy was betting whenever he had a hand and never bluffing or semi-bluffing and the other guy slowplayed everything, but bluffed fairly often. [/ QUOTE ] sooo true... people think stats are a substitue for good reads... you should see the notes i have on people... i still try and go through every hh that goes to showdown and i 6 table... no replacement for good solid reads... |
|
#4
02-11-2007, 11:33 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: OT: STTF [censored] thread, February
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Another thing in cash is to really watch your opponents. I had a couple of players in one game the other night who had fairly similar loose passive stats and played somewhat similarly preflop, but postflop they were almost exactly the opposite. On HUD, even looking at a lot of stats they looked the same, but one guy was betting whenever he had a hand and never bluffing or semi-bluffing and the other guy slowplayed everything, but bluffed fairly often. [/ QUOTE ] sooo true... people think stats are a substitue for good reads... you should see the notes i have on people... i still try and go through every hh that goes to showdown and i 6 table... no replacement for good solid reads... [/ QUOTE ] Ya your right but I'm too lazy it's def a leak. |
|
#5
02-11-2007, 11:44 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: OT: STTF [censored] thread, February
OK Suzzer, sad b*stard that I am I wrote a spreadsheet to run a monte carlo simulation of SNG results at a given skill level. It's value is in showing what winning/losing streaks are "normal" if you don't change how you play. That is, it isolates variance so you know what to expect. It's not perfect, but if you want it, PM me and I'll email you or aim me, I'm xPeru on AIM.
|
|
#7
02-12-2007, 02:07 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: OT: STTF [censored] thread, February
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Another thing in cash is to really watch your opponents. I had a couple of players in one game the other night who had fairly similar loose passive stats and played somewhat similarly preflop, but postflop they were almost exactly the opposite. On HUD, even looking at a lot of stats they looked the same, but one guy was betting whenever he had a hand and never bluffing or semi-bluffing and the other guy slowplayed everything, but bluffed fairly often. [/ QUOTE ] sooo true... people think stats are a substitue for good reads... you should see the notes i have on people... i still try and go through every hh that goes to showdown and i 6 table... no replacement for good solid reads... [/ QUOTE ] Todd, Do you have any shortcut for doing this? I would love to be able to just go through showndown hands without having to flip through the rest. |
|
#9
02-12-2007, 02:19 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: OT: STTF [censored] thread, February
[ QUOTE ]
Don't have a converter for Omaha, but this is the most hilarious thing I've seen, and why PLO is the solution: PokerStars Game #8400215011: Omaha Pot Limit ($0.10/$0.25) - 2007/02/12 - 01:13:44 (ET) Table 'China' 9-max Seat #1 is the button Seat 1: Titus818 ($10.05 in chips) Seat 2: peteowes ($24.75 in chips) Seat 3: HarryPeru ($72.75 in chips) Seat 4: sxm59 ($29.20 in chips) Seat 5: Josecito29 ($27 in chips) Seat 6: Sandro Cava ($49.35 in chips) Seat 7: Bearss85 ($22.05 in chips) Seat 8: DONKEYLUVIN ($30.90 in chips) Seat 9: GrumpyB69 ($28.85 in chips) peteowes: posts small blind $0.10 HarryPeru: posts big blind $0.25 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to HarryPeru [Qh Js 5d 9d] sxm59: folds Josecito29: calls $0.25 Sandro Cava: folds Bearss85: folds DONKEYLUVIN: folds GrumpyB69: calls $0.25 Titus818: calls $0.25 peteowes: calls $0.15 HarryPeru: checks *** FLOP *** [Ah Td Jh] peteowes: checks HarryPeru: checks Josecito29: checks GrumpyB69: checks Titus818: checks *** TURN *** [Ah Td Jh] [Qs] peteowes: checks HarryPeru: checks Josecito29: checks GrumpyB69: checks Titus818: checks *** RIVER *** [Ah Td Jh Qs] [Ks] peteowes: checks HarryPeru: bets $0.75 Josecito29: folds GrumpyB69: folds Titus818: folds peteowes: folds HarryPeru said, "lol boards the nuts" HarryPeru collected $1.20 from pot HarryPeru: shows [Qh Js 5d 9d] (a straight, Ten to Ace) *** SUMMARY *** Total pot $1.25 | Rake $0.05 Board [Ah Td Jh Qs Ks] Seat 1: Titus818 (button) folded on the River Seat 2: peteowes (small blind) folded on the River Seat 3: HarryPeru (big blind) collected ($1.20) Seat 4: sxm59 folded before Flop (didn't bet) Seat 5: Josecito29 folded on the River Seat 6: Sandro Cava folded before Flop (didn't bet) Seat 7: Bearss85 folded before Flop (didn't bet) Seat 8: DONKEYLUVIN folded before Flop (didn't bet) Seat 9: GrumpyB69 folded on the River [/ QUOTE ] uhhh wanna play some PLO with me? |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
