OT: [censored] thread, Feb, READ RULES IN TOP POST

[Eagles]

[ QUOTE ]
Random thought:

I don't do this very much unless i completely agree with a previous post, but what do people think about JUST quoting a previous post in a strategy thread??

I guess it helps to see that a bunch of people agree with a certain post, but once 2 or 3 people do it, is it really necessary for 5+ people to keep quoting it? Is it just a post count booster? Do OPs like to see the quoting?

COME UP WITH YOUR OWN THOUGHTS PEOPLE. I UNDERSTAND THAT AFTER I POST THERE IS NO MORE NEW INFORMATION TO ADD, BUT YOU CAN AT LEAST PRETEND TO SAY IT DIFFERENTLY!!

Idk, im just ranting. Anyone else think it gets out of hand sometimes?

EDIT: fwiw, im not saying DONT quote if you agree with a point, but once it gets to 4+ people...bleh, whatever. i dont even know what im arguing anymore. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

So I had this idea to go around everytime you made a strat post to quote it and that's it. Then I realized it would take way too much time and energy so I just gave up.