Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Poker Legislation

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #19  
Old 02-07-2007, 03:43 PM
Billman Billman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Huggling
Posts: 425
Default Re: How about Cardplayer getting into the processing business ??

[ QUOTE ]

My information is from finextra which has a vested interest here and European based banks do a significant portion of all SWIFT traffic.

[/ QUOTE ]

Good catch. My description was a little misleading. Bank wires do travel on a network that is less willing to participate in the DOJ's witch hunt. That being said, a US citizen would need to initiate a transfer via a US bank (unless they had a foreign bank account in which case the argument is moot). If the DOJ supplies a list of recipient accounts that US banks should ban from transferring funds to it has the same effect as an ACH/EFT blockage.

And the DOJ could be sneaky about it and put eWallets and gaming companies on the same list as known money laundering accounts. The bank wouldn't even know why it was supposed to block the transactions other than the account turned up on a list.

And if we want to get real, real technical MoneyGram and Western Union are bank wires as well. They're anonymous bank wires though.
Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.