So who thinks Party was on the ball?

[Instyle007]

Actually I'm 100% correct. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] I check pokersitescout regularly and on a regular basis FTP was ahead of Party when reviewing the 7 day avg numbers.

And no, I'm too cheap to bet on anything and I don't want to invoke the wire act. [img]/images/graemlins/blush.gif[/img]

[pygmyhipo]

[ QUOTE ]
Honestly, how many casual or recreational players will want to deposit online again after they have gotten burned by Neteller holding their money for 6 months? They will see it no other way, even when they get their money back they will think they were screwed, plain and simple.

[/ QUOTE ]

Most casual/recreational players (aka fish) keep their money in NETeller only for the two minutes between depositing it from their credit card and transferring it into the poker site.

The only way they got burned by the NETeller fiasco is that they have to find a new way to deposit.

-pyg

[NL__Fool]

[ QUOTE ]
Actually I'm 100% correct. I check pokersitescout regularly and on a regular basis FTP was ahead of Party when reviewing the 7 day avg numbers.


[/ QUOTE ]

Thats some good crack you are smoking. I 'd advise you to check again or perhaps come back to reality?

Full tilt has never been ahead of Party unless you are selectivly checking the 7 day averages when Party voluntarily chose to ban US players. Any time before that or slightly after that date Full tilt is always behind Party

As of todays 7 day average Party has 50% more players then Full Tilt.

[ QUOTE ]
And no, I'm too cheap to bet on anything

[/ QUOTE ]

It's not cause your cheap, it's cause you are wrong.