![]() |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
________________________________________ Devil- is it possible that all parties involved were not operating under the same presumed code Blair talks about? [/ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Absolutely possible - in fact, I'd say likely, otherwise Mr. Goodwin would have taken precautions against the possibility that Mr. Ivey was engaging in a deception. That does not, IMO, relieve Mr. Goodwin from the consequences of the omission, no more than operating a car without using a seat belt relieves a driver from the consequences of getting into an accident. [/ QUOTE ] Mr Ivey was involved in lying not deception, he was asked a straight question and lied, how is that deception? Your analogy is nonsense, if you drive a car without a seatbelt, you have knowingly taken an extra risk if you have an accident, are you trying to say he should know whether he will have an accident on a given day? That is how your analogy pans out. Ivey lied, therefore he cheated. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|