![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: who likes | |||
| check/call |
|
1 | 8.33% |
| bet/call |
|
5 | 41.67% |
| bet/3b |
|
5 | 41.67% |
| check/raise |
|
1 | 8.33% |
| bet/fold (NITS) |
|
0 | 0% |
| Voters: 12. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
This is not necessary, especially if you don't play well with a deeper stack. Coming from a sng background, we are very well suited for buying in short. I've recently switch to FT, where it seems 90% of the players buy in real short. Thankfully, none of them know how to play the short stack. Someone that plays well with a short stack is very annoying. [/ QUOTE ] Table selection is key. Find tables where there are donkeys with large stacks to take. Why sit and wait for a powerful hand to win 10bb when a donkey will stack off 100bb with the same hand. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] This is not necessary, especially if you don't play well with a deeper stack. Coming from a sng background, we are very well suited for buying in short. I've recently switch to FT, where it seems 90% of the players buy in real short. Thankfully, none of them know how to play the short stack. Someone that plays well with a short stack is very annoying. [/ QUOTE ] Table selection is key. Find tables where there are donkeys with large stacks to take. Why sit and wait for a powerful hand to win 10bb when a donkey will stack off 100bb with the same hand. [/ QUOTE ] Man, I was just giving an alternative. I buy in full for that very reason. I understand what you are saying. But, you just made some definitive statement about always buy-in full and left it at that. There are merits to both strategies and both can very profitable if done right. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|