![]() |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
-He has a very high W$WSF, esp for somebody with such a high VPIP. [/ QUOTE ] This is what really confuses me here. As Nate has shown in other posts, there should be something of an inverse correlation here. Taken alone, his W$WSF is good for the 30/60 game, but not better than other top players. The thing is, the other top players who have similar W$WSF numbers in that game have substantially lower VPIPs. And I am talking 10% or 12% lower, not 3% or 4%. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|