![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I still think Harrah's should be listed in the under 100 tournies.
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Very nice...but you should mention what portion of the buy-in is rake and what portion goes into the prize pool. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
Very nice...but you should mention what portion of the buy-in is rake and what portion goes into the prize pool. [/ QUOTE ] Thanks. All that info (including rake/juice %, payouts, blind structures, etc) is available from the Torunament Details link at the bottom of each listed tourney. I wanted to avoid too much clutter in the 5 lines that each tourney got, so I just stuck to the skeleton basics. Anyone interested in more info can click on the link to bring up all the details in a separate page. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
I still think Harrah's should be listed in the under 100 tournies. [/ QUOTE ] Harrahs/Ballys/Paris/Flamingo were all excluded due to a few factors, including that they are generally not considered good or the best tournies. Fun tournies, yes, but not necessarily good ones. 25-40 avg number of players coupled with their 15-20 min levels (depending on the house), and fairly short chip counts, do not translate to a "Best of" list in my opinin, so they were excluded. Generally, "good tournies for under $100" is a bit of an oxymoron, as all good, better, and best tournies have $100+ buy ins in Vegas. However, the two I listed are accepted as being the most recommended and the best, despite their low buy in (i.e. best value). |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Harrahs ususlly has about 70 players in it and has an alternate list. the limits were 25 minutes for the first 3 levels then 20 after the break. I agree that Sahara and Ceasers are the best by far but Harrah's is an honorable mention at least from me [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img].
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Duly noted. Thanks for posting. Sounds like a pretty good tourney.
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thanks, I enjoyed it almost as much as a similar post on AVP [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]
I'm heading to Vegas on 2/10 and I think that I will have to try Caesars and Venetian and weigh in. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'm not an expert, just a tourist, but I was wondering why the Orleans tournaments didn't make the sub-100 list. The couple of times I played it seemed like a target-rich environment. Rake too large?
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
A similar post? Wouldn't know anything about it [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]
In all seriousness, in order to allow this thread to be posted, I needed to make some reasonable adjustments to it (in order to follow 2+2 guidelines), which is why it is presented the way it is here. ++++++++ With regard to the Orleans tournies, once again, I opted to just include the best two overall for the under $100 section, as most tournies under $100 are all pretty standard and vanilla (and not the best in the city). I hesitated to even include the ones I did, as really, but due to demand, I included what is agreed overall to be the two best. In general, of course, the best tournies are the ones over $100 (over $200, actually), so just including the popular Sahara and CP ones seemed like enough. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
how bout the nugget. my friend likes to play there. i ddint see the blind schedule posted but from my understanding
if u do the rebuy and the chip bonus u start out with 6K starting. i m assuming blinds start out at 25/50 with 20 min blinds what do u think? anyone play it? Tournament Detail Casino Name: Golden Nugget Game Type: NL Hold'em Day of Week: Mo,Tu,We,Th,Fr,Sa,Su Time of Day: 07:00 PM Total Buy In: 65 Admin Free: 19 Fees Returned: 70% Rebuy: Yes Rebuy Description: Single (1) $40 rebuy available in the first hour for 3000 in chips. Addon: Yes Addon Description: $5 staff add on bonus taken at signup for 500 in chips. Included in starting chip count and casino + dealer fee. Starting Chip Count: 2500 Avg Number Players: 30 Payout Structure: coming soon Level Time: 00:20 Avg Tourney Length: 2-3 hours Blind Structure: coming soon |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|