Moving up

[Mercman572]

the differences at party at least are huge, I think you can expect to lose 2-3 buyins just because of the learning curve. So I don't think you're giving yourself much of a chance for success with that role.

[zippoquick]

I was thinking about following fimbulwinters advice from his reply to the moving up from 25 NL thread, where he writes you should have 1200+ to take a shot at NL100, but maybe I should build a gigger bankroll before taking a shot, no? advice needed.

[Jamougha]

I think it's fine if you're willing to move down after loosing a couple of buyins. I have done this a couple of times. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] If variance smiles on you then stay up.

[Godfather80]

[ QUOTE ]
I was thinking about following fimbulwinters advice from his reply to the moving up from 25 NL thread, where he writes you should have 1200+ to take a shot at NL100, but maybe I should build a gigger bankroll before taking a shot, no? advice needed.

[/ QUOTE ]

But that isn't all that Fim said. When contemplating a move up to NL100, Fim said you should:

[ QUOTE ]
100NL when:

- you're confident playing draws
- you can spot good semibluff opportunities
- you can lay down AA/KK unimproved
- you're attacking the blinds in easy steal situations
- you have 1200+

[/ QUOTE ]

If you are doing all of these, then you are ready (according to Fim). But with $1200, it won't take much to push you back down.