U Make the Decision – One Player Knows and One Doesn’t

[AKQJ10]

*grunch*

Wait for the action to get back to Seat 3. This could be at the end of the round or because there's a raise by Seat 7.

Now, under SOSA, everyone's entitled to the same information as Seat 3, so Seat 2 tables his all-in hand.

I suppose a very strict SOSA interpretation would be to show the hand immediately, but common sense says that Seats 3 and 5 acted on the $300 without that knowledge. Since 3 is the offender -- possibly an unwitting offender -- I have no problem with letting 7 act on more information than 3. But 5 should have been entitled to this information too, so my only concern with showing the hand immediately (instead of when the action comes back around) is that it would be benefitting 7 vis a vis 5.

BTW, it sounds very innocent -- I used to forget that all-in hands aren't shown if there are still multiple players with chips.