![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Should this thread leave NVG? | |||
| Yes. |
|
8 | 12.90% |
| No. |
|
54 | 87.10% |
| Voters: 62. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
TWP, Rolen:
The bet is on: "strong enough to conclusively award one side the win" "I agree." The panel will decide whether there is enough evidence, beyond a reasonable doubt, to award the bet. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Gildwulf : No problem with you on panel
TWP : I want these guys to decide if either of us has proof ElD : That's correct |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
TWP, Rolen:
Longtime 2+2er Nick B has agreed to be on the panel. He is very trustworthy and can be unbiased here. BTW, Nick has followed this thread and noticed that Rolen's ** was from over a year ago, so based on Rolen not being a tard here removed them. However, he does not know Rolen and has no stake/bias in either side winning. He is just as much of an argumentative prick as me. I have IM'd Dean. If he gets back to me within the next 20 minutes or so, he is the third member. Otherwise, Gild is. Gild, when did your name get capitalized? Also, PM me your IM, thx. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
El D: please keep in mind that in this post Rolen stated, and I agreed, that we needed "two identical PT stats for the session from two sources to confirm either way". That is the standard for deciding the bet.
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
TWP, Rolen:
Please post in a single post a summary of your case and evidence backing up your statements. If you cite info in this thread, don't bother linking to the posts, but please do quote stuff you reference. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
El D: Please confirm that you are aware of the proper standard for deciding.
Rolen: In order to potentially save time, please state that you believe you have satisfied the standard for deciding, as quoted in your previous post. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
1 sec, who is on the panel?
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
WTF is going on in this thread now?
Cliff notes anyone? |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
For ease of reference, these are the three sets of data.
http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/sh...age=0&vc=1 Good2CU's PT shot http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/sh...age=0&vc=1 Highstakes.nu's data http://i146.photobucket.com/albums/r...5/good2cu2.jpg Unknown dataminer's data |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Cliff notes:
Good2cu was doing well in some high stakes cash games. People started sweating him and after a while he lot a couple of big pots and people were speculating that he was down money. He posted in this thread that he did not lose money and was, in fact, up 10k. Posters The Worst Player and Rolen decided to make a bet on whether he was truely up 10k or not. The data they have recieved from dataminers has been inconistant and not satisfactory to award either poster the bet. A 3rd party unbiased panel (headed by El D) is now being set up in order to determine who is the winner of the bet. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|