Let's talk about Way Ahead/Way Behind (rather long)

[durron597]

[ QUOTE ]
One thing you might want to add: your starting hand in the example you provide...

[/ QUOTE ]

obviously JJ

[seke2]

The board in your example has a number of draws, including a flush draw and some potential straight draws. While they certainly have to be discounted because of your reads, that really isn't a drawless board. I'd be more inclined to view the hand as truly WA/WB if you at least put a rainbow flop out there.

[Assani Fisher]

[ QUOTE ]
The board in your example has a number of draws, including a flush draw and some potential straight draws. While they certainly have to be discounted because of your reads, that really isn't a drawless board. I'd be more inclined to view the hand as truly WA/WB if you at least put a rainbow flop out there.

[/ QUOTE ]

That was my first thought too- that it was very strange for him to refer to a 67Q with 2 hearts flop as having "no draws."

Edit: NM...i see that it was a typo now.