![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
Really it's Frist and the others who used a procedural trick to get this thing passed in an unrelated bill without any real debate on its merits that we should be pissed at (and mildly irritated that the rules make this sort of thing possible in the first place). It's frankly a blatantly UNdemocratic move. What are we a bunch of godless commies that we pull the same crap the People's Republic of China did? (little John Wayne there) [/ QUOTE ] Riders = incredibly common legislative tool. Pork barrel legislation is a huge part of what congress does. Not a shocker that a bill that effects so few people winds up as a rider. The cold hard fact is, when you say how “Undemocratic” the bill is, you have to ask what is a democracy? Sure, it is protecting the rights of the individual, but in a democracy, majority rules. We, as gamblers (which is how congress perceives us, not as poker players) are in the minority here. The zealots of the religious right love this bill, and it really doesn’t matter to many other people. The proportion of people pissed about the bill compared to the people that support “moralist” legislation is in the favor of the latter. IMO, a big reason this went through is the economic implications of shipping billions overseas. Online poker is an unregulated, multibillion dollar industry, and it certainly hurts the trade deficit. However, if our government wasn’t retarded, they would have legalized it, found a way to tax it, and then eagerly tried to get china into poker. It could be the freakini anti-Walmart, but they are too busy trying to hold down the moral vote. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
IMO, a big reason this went through is the economic implications of shipping billions overseas. Online poker is an unregulated, multibillion dollar industry, and it certainly hurts the trade deficit. [/ QUOTE ] This factor is very overrated. Even if online gambling sent $10 billion overseas yearly, it would have virtually no economic impact on a national basis, and would account for less than 1% of the yearly trade deficit. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] IMO, a big reason this went through is the economic implications of shipping billions overseas. Online poker is an unregulated, multibillion dollar industry, and it certainly hurts the trade deficit. [/ QUOTE ] This factor is very overrated. Even if online gambling sent $10 billion overseas yearly, it would have virtually no economic impact on a national basis, and would account for less than 1% of the yearly trade deficit. [/ QUOTE ] BUT DUDE THE TERRORISTS ARE GETTING ALL OF THAT MONEY ZOMG THE WORLD IS GOING TO DIE |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Anyone who votes against the republicans because of this bill is an absolute moron. My God do you have any idea how much rides on this election? I LOVE poker, just like everyone here. But I'd rather have lower taxes, feel safe, not have San Francisco views put on me, fight terrorism and have a robust economy, than play online poker. I live in the middle of nowhere West Virginia and even I can find a cash game or tournament every day of the week, sometimes multiple games.
Yeah the ban sucks, but there are WAY more important things on the line than online gambling. Also, I didn't see very many, if any, Dems voting against this or fighting it. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
not have San Francisco views put on me [/ QUOTE ] Seriously dude, you need to stop listening to Fox News. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] not have San Francisco views put on me [/ QUOTE ] Seriously dude, you need to stop listening to Fox News. [/ QUOTE ] |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] not have San Francisco views put on me [/ QUOTE ] Seriously dude, you need to stop listening to Fox News. [/ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ] depends...it actually is the most fair and balanced of the news networks but, that isn't saying much |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yeah, because everything else is so objective.
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Pelosi vows to get poker a carve out add on to the bill to be voted on to impeach Bush in January.
Source HERE I love women! |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
Anyone who votes against the republicans because of this bill is an absolute moron. My God do you have any idea how much rides on this election? I LOVE poker, just like everyone here. But I'd rather have lower taxes, feel safe, not have San Francisco views put on me, fight terrorism and have a robust economy, than play online poker. I live in the middle of nowhere West Virginia and even I can find a cash game or tournament every day of the week, sometimes multiple games. Yeah the ban sucks, but there are WAY more important things on the line than online gambling. Also, I didn't see very many, if any, Dems voting against this or fighting it. [/ QUOTE ] This bill is not the only reason that I, a lifelong Republican, will be voting for the Democrats this election, but it is a factor. The other factors are the war in Iraq, the lies that have been told to us, stem cell research, immigration, health care and insurance costs, and many other factors. The Republicans are leading us straight to hell, and they need to go. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|