Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > High Stakes

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-18-2005, 04:42 AM
Larry David Larry David is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Hugging it out
Posts: 1,405
Default Re: Analysis

Please close this thread AZK. I'll let other's elaborate.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-18-2005, 04:58 AM
El Diablo El Diablo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 33,802
Default Re: Analysis

[ QUOTE ]
Please close this thread AZK. I'll let other's elaborate.

[/ QUOTE ]

Please don't. A number of us are still waiting for some elaboration.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-18-2005, 05:02 AM
Gary Stevenson Gary Stevenson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: saying \"sigh\" every other hand
Posts: 6,301
Default Re: Analysis

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Please close this thread AZK. I'll let other's elaborate.

[/ QUOTE ]

Please don't. A number of us are still waiting for some elaboration.

[/ QUOTE ]

Can you elaborate please El D...or i guess maybe someone else could [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]

ZZzzZZzz
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-18-2005, 05:04 AM
El Diablo El Diablo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 33,802
Default Re: Analysis

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Please close this thread AZK. I'll let other's elaborate.

[/ QUOTE ]

Please don't. A number of us are still waiting for some elaboration.

[/ QUOTE ]

Can you elaborate please El D...or i guess maybe someone else could [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]

ZZzzZZzz

[/ QUOTE ]

I have elaborated in detail. I am simply waiting for an explanation from Mason, David, or Ed as to why Mason is mocking his opponents because when given the choice to make either $40 or $15, they think it is better to make $40.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-18-2005, 05:08 AM
Gary Stevenson Gary Stevenson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: saying \"sigh\" every other hand
Posts: 6,301
Default Re: Analysis

sorry if you took my "elaborate" post seriously El D...was just mocking the other hundred 2+2ers who have overused the word in this thread. I agree with what you are saying and hope mason gives a satisfying response to finally end this thread.

ZZzzZZzz
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-18-2005, 05:17 AM
SuperJez SuperJez is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 207
Default Re: Analysis

There cannot ever be a satisfactory response from masons side, as his original posts statement is just plain wrong.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-18-2005, 10:51 AM
wtfsvi wtfsvi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Norway
Posts: 2,532
Default Re: Analysis

[ QUOTE ]
There cannot ever be a satisfactory response from masons side, as his original posts statement is just plain wrong.

[/ QUOTE ] Sure there can. "I was wrong, sorry. And I should have admitted that a long time ago."

There's nothing wrong with making a mistake. But be man enough to admit it.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-18-2005, 10:51 AM
voltron. voltron. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: 3barreling my way to broketown
Posts: 8,106
Default Re: Analysis

[ QUOTE ]
I have elaborated in detail. I am simply waiting for an explanation from Mason, David, or Ed as to why Mason is mocking his opponents because when given the choice to make either $40 or $15, they think it is better to make $40.

[/ QUOTE ]

El d, don't you this this is poor way to evaluate the value of two hands in no limit? I haven't read all 300 posts of calcuations, ive read a handful of them, but its such a complex game with so many streets and factors that this seems like a very imperfect way to come to a conclusion on which hand is better.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-18-2005, 11:28 AM
Isura Isura is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 13,926
Default Re: Analysis

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I have elaborated in detail. I am simply waiting for an explanation from Mason, David, or Ed as to why Mason is mocking his opponents because when given the choice to make either $40 or $15, they think it is better to make $40.

[/ QUOTE ]

El d, don't you this this is poor way to evaluate the value of two hands in no limit? I haven't read all 300 posts of calcuations, ive read a handful of them, but its such a complex game with so many streets and factors that this seems like a very imperfect way to come to a conclusion on which hand is better.

[/ QUOTE ]

Uhm, is there a better metric to compare hand value than their expected value?? Please elaborate.

Unless you are referring to the analysis of how the numbers $40 and $15 came up. Offcourse this is imperfect, but it is more convincing than intuitive hand waving and heuristics.

Edited for spelling.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-18-2005, 12:00 PM
Mark1808 Mark1808 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 590
Default Re: Analysis

[ QUOTE ]

I have elaborated in detail. I am simply waiting for an explanation from Mason, David, or Ed as to why Mason is mocking his opponents because when given the choice to make either $40 or $15, they think it is better to make $40.

[/ QUOTE ]

I WAS WRONG!! BUT I AM STILL RIGHT!

As Diablo properly pointed out to me in a PM the Jack could hit the turn or river. The chance that Ace or Q hits the flop with no J and J hits turn or river tips the balance 40 -15 for JJ, as has been stated many times and I was too hard headed to see that MY PROBABILITIES WERE OFF.

But there is a critical differance between JJ and AQ on the turn and river when they don't improve.

When AQ does not improve, they have nothing! When AQ improves and is ahead of JJ, JJ still has something making extracting future bets a possibility!

What can really happen if Ace or Q flops and NO J hits the flop turn or river? What if AQ bets a small amount turn and river, like $100? Will JJ call? If so, AQ is better! $67 to -16. Even $50 turn and river bets make AQ better 41 to 14.

Bet sizes are likely to be higher if AQ is ahead. If J checks turn and AQ bets JJ is likely to fold. But not 100% of the time like AQ! Not with players I have seen. And even a small amount of money that AQ could squeeze out of JJ on the turn and river would tip the balance.

I set the percentages and win / loss possibilities in a spread sheat and played around with the differant turn and river betting scenarios. You will see that this is what tips the scale in favor of AQ.

The fact that that JJ will likely call turn and river bets when behind as opposed to AQ makes AQ the higher EV in this example.

When AQ is ahead on the flop and J hits the turn or river, it is still easy for AQ to shut down...why? Because with the $150 reraise if the Q flops AQ still fears AA, KK or QQ and if the Ace flops AQ still fears AK.

Simply put even though JJ is a better hand, because of pot odds and the ease of getting away from the hand when behind, as opposed to JJ, AQ is preferable hand.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.