Too risky?

[teddyFBI]

[ QUOTE ]
Fair enough, but why don't you think he lays down trips?

[/ QUOTE ]

Because he's not bad at poker.

[Requin]

Ummm regardless of the risk-to-reward, tell me why I'm not repping a strong hand? Do you never c/r a good player who will bet this flop almost always?

[luckychewy]

[ QUOTE ]
Ummm regardless of the risk-to-reward, tell me why I'm not repping a strong hand? Do you never c/r a good player who will bet this flop almost always?

[/ QUOTE ]

dude i think converter messed up, otherwise u are spewing hardcore.

[Requin]

No it could easily be a spew, that's why I'm running it by you guys. Basically I think he almost always bets the river, so essentially this is just a more costly (but with greater reward) rebluff, and I thought it was a better bluff line than a turn 3-bet.

[luckychewy]

well in that case i just can't understand why u would think hes gonna be bluffing this turn v often. i would fold to the turn rz, but i guess if you really think hes bluffing then this line is pretty hot as opposed to a turn 3-bet. but, as i said before i would fold turn and to be honest i wouldn't even have bet out to begin with.

[Durer]

its a brilliant move [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

[DLizzle]

results?

[wizardplow]

Hero heard Doyle say on TV that he doesn't need cards to win, he plays the players not the cards, so he was giving it a shot.

[teddyFBI]

All sarcasm aside, the funny thing about NL is that you can always convince yourself that there's no such thing as a "bad" play. Only a "shot" that doesn't work out. You called a double-pot-sized raise with a gutshot straight on a paired board. Just so you chould check-raise it away from the guy on the river??!?

It seems that most ppl in this thread are telling you that it's a spew. Take that for whatever you think it's worth. I'm beginning to think this was not a serious post.