![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
partial points for hands raked under $1 [/ QUOTE ] |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] partial points for hands raked under $1 [/ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ] very important for the fishes |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
partial points for hands raked under $1 [/ QUOTE ] |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
The FPP system should definitely take into account the number of players at the table. Six-handed play in particular gets screwed because we still pay the full $3 rake. At a ten-handed table that is 30 cents per player, at six-handed it is 50 cents per player, yet the FPP we receive is the same.
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
The FPP system should definitely take into account the number of players at the table. Six-handed play in particular gets screwed because we still pay the full $3 rake. At a ten-handed table that is 30 cents per player, at six-handed it is 50 cents per player, yet the FPP we receive is the same. [/ QUOTE ] definitely fix the fpp system somehow. ring players get screwed compared to tournament/sng players, and 6-max players get screwed even more. it would be best to completely base fpps on contribution to rake, even in cash games. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|