|
|
|
|
#1
09-30-2006, 03:24 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: results
[ QUOTE ]
additionally. the fact that someone in mid stakes gives advice like this and wins and how bad ive been running this month make me borderline suicidal. rj [/ QUOTE ] rj, then maybe you should follow up on your borderline ambitions so that your close-minded opinions can go with you. there's no case for folding pre? think about ALL the factors for calling/raising and folding... and if you still think there's no case for folding pre.. then maybe you should evaluate why you're "running so bad". 
|
|
#2
09-30-2006, 06:33 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: results
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] additionally. the fact that someone in mid stakes gives advice like this and wins and how bad ive been running this month make me borderline suicidal. rj [/ QUOTE ] rj, then maybe you should follow up on your borderline ambitions so that your close-minded opinions can go with you. there's no case for folding pre? think about ALL the factors for calling/raising and folding... and if you still think there's no case for folding pre.. then maybe you should evaluate why you're "running so bad". [/ QUOTE ] folding is horrible. period.
|
|
#3
09-30-2006, 12:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: results
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] additionally. the fact that someone in mid stakes gives advice like this and wins and how bad ive been running this month make me borderline suicidal. rj [/ QUOTE ] rj, then maybe you should follow up on your borderline ambitions so that your close-minded opinions can go with you. there's no case for folding pre? think about ALL the factors for calling/raising and folding... and if you still think there's no case for folding pre.. then maybe you should evaluate why you're "running so bad". [/ QUOTE ] folding is horrible. period. [/ QUOTE ] HOLLA! rj
|
|
#4
09-30-2006, 12:39 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: results
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] additionally. the fact that someone in mid stakes gives advice like this and wins and how bad ive been running this month make me borderline suicidal. rj [/ QUOTE ] rj, then maybe you should follow up on your borderline ambitions so that your close-minded opinions can go with you. there's no case for folding pre? think about ALL the factors for calling/raising and folding... and if you still think there's no case for folding pre.. then maybe you should evaluate why you're "running so bad". [/ QUOTE ] i wish i could make posts as wrong as yours and then tell people who disagree to commit suicide. youre a valuable addition to this board my friend. the advice youre giving here is on a situation that is just not even close, or maybe just on the results? i dont see how you can honestly think this is a fold. i still think you must be misreading the action or something. my "running bad" involves losing to running quads twice this week in the very very few hands ive played. but yeah, you got any other really really lame insults to defend the fact that youre wrong? rj
|
|
#5
09-30-2006, 01:03 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: results
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] additionally. the fact that someone in mid stakes gives advice like this and wins and how bad ive been running this month make me borderline suicidal. rj [/ QUOTE ] rj, then maybe you should follow up on your borderline ambitions so that your close-minded opinions can go with you. there's no case for folding pre? think about ALL the factors for calling/raising and folding... and if you still think there's no case for folding pre.. then maybe you should evaluate why you're "running so bad". [/ QUOTE ] I am glad you finally got outed. Usually your self-aggrandizing, results-oriented instructional essays are tacked on to what smart people have already said and simply come off as annoying. Here, you went out on a weird limb and have finally been exposed as utterly laughable and probably one of the worst posters on 2+2 due to a combination of: your preachy tone, horrible advice and obstinate positions. If you don't want to listen to what everyone is telling you regarding one of the most obvious plays in the history of poker, that's fine. But please take this garbage over to your blog and stop tarding up worthwhile threads. Set sail, tpir
|
|
#6
09-30-2006, 08:54 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: results
Sorry wasnt Bill king player 500/1000 with newhizzle the other week? I just cant see how somebody who plays that high can get n easy preflop situation so wrong. (or do i have the wrong guy)
And as for misplaying the hand postflop, i thought OP played it almost perfectly.
|
|
#7
09-30-2006, 08:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: results
[ QUOTE ]
Sorry wasnt Bill king player 500/1000 with newhizzle the other week? [/ QUOTE ] just because people play big doesn't mean that they play well. there is a reason those games go.
|
|
#8
09-30-2006, 11:06 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: results
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Sorry wasnt Bill king player 500/1000 with newhizzle the other week? [/ QUOTE ] just because people play big doesn't mean that they play well. there is a reason those games go. [/ QUOTE ] Oh i realise this, i just wanted to make sure it was the same person
|
|
#9
09-30-2006, 11:18 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: results
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Sorry wasnt Bill king player 500/1000 with newhizzle the other week? [/ QUOTE ] just because people play big doesn't mean that they play well. there is a reason those games go. [/ QUOTE ] Oh i realise this, i just wanted to make sure it was the same person [/ QUOTE ] ok. not sure if it was him in the bigger games. for his sake, i hope it wasn't.
|
|
#10
10-01-2006, 02:20 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: results
im dissapointed he's stopped insulting me since everyone decided he was wrong. it was a noble path, why discontinue the journey?
rj
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
