Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Poker Legislation

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-15-2006, 11:25 PM
scorer scorer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,530
Default Re: So worst case scenario with banks still no biggie?

blocking neteller?? so you'll be able to fund thru paypal or some other middleman/other neteller. This i believe is more to make it tougher for people to place wagers/minor to gambel.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-16-2006, 12:23 AM
mrhat187 mrhat187 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 161
Default Re: So worst case scenario with banks still no biggie?

Ok the people who replied to this post say junk about neteller......reread what I said good lord its like you didn't even read anything. How can a bank stop you from buying a phone card?....they can't....how could they stop you from buying say a gift card.......they can't etc. etc. etc. Party Poker already has numerous strange alternatices too funding your account. Oh and the dummy talking about banning ISP's........that bill is already dead and stalled get with the news and then comment.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-16-2006, 12:28 AM
Lawman007 Lawman007 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,329
Default Re: So worst case scenario with banks still no biggie?

[ QUOTE ]
Oh and the dummy talking about banning ISP's........that bill is already dead and stalled get with the news and then comment.

[/ QUOTE ]

As usual, the one calling others names is the real idiot. LOL
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-16-2006, 12:42 AM
xwillience xwillience is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Insanity.
Posts: 3,646
Default Re: So worst case scenario with banks still no biggie?

in all honesty, I dont see ISPs ever banning poker sites. That would be inviting insane amounts of trouble. to censor the internet would only piss a certain sub-culture off. I dont think we have to worry about that ever.


Also, from what I understand, that part of the bill did get left behind in favor of getting the Leach Bill attached to the DOD authorization.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-16-2006, 12:46 AM
DuderinoAB DuderinoAB is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: I buy T$...pm me
Posts: 1,023
Default Re: So worst case scenario with banks still no biggie?

If your ISP blocks access to a site, you need to run through a proxy. This will enable to visit any website you please without your ISP knowing...and its perfectly legal. Will the fish do this? Probably not, but will the ISP thing stop any of us from playing? Nope. There may be other issues, but this one is irrelevant.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-18-2006, 05:08 PM
MasterLJ MasterLJ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: PARTY PRIME!!!!!!
Posts: 5,631
Default Re: So worst case scenario with banks still no biggie?

I know I'm 6 pages deep into this debate and I have only skimmed...

But I highly doubt ISPs are going to roll over and censor the internet without a fight. They will fight this tooth and nail. They are not required to block any other content, and they fought the RIAA on issues like handing over information to Federal Authorities on the issue of file sharing.

If the implications are correct, this Bill will end up in the Supreme Court.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-18-2006, 10:35 PM
xwillience xwillience is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Insanity.
Posts: 3,646
Default Re: So worst case scenario with banks still no biggie?

[ QUOTE ]
I'm 6 pages deep..

[/ QUOTE ]

ugggg.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.