![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Should Stars confiscate all funds in a cheater's account? | |||
| yes |
|
134 | 82.21% |
| no |
|
29 | 17.79% |
| Voters: 163. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
Sorry, i know we shouldn't wake sleeping dogs, but i have had a conversation with the online help chat thing. They send me the conversation by email so i will use it if needed: MANSION Paul N: RE: Hi there, i see in the T&C the following line: "MANSION reserves the right to revoke or nullify promotion entitlements to players who appear to participate in strategies intending to profit from promotional bonuses " Could you explain that to me. is getting a profit not the whole idea behind a bonus ? MANSION Paul N: hello Wacken: hi MANSION Paul N: If the strategy is beyond the terms and conditions of the promotion MANSION Paul N: for example ' duplicate accounts' Wacken: ok, but playing my wagering requirement in a game that offers a positive EV for the bonus after clearing the WR will not be a problem ? MANSION Paul N: ev? Wacken: Expected Value, you're in the gambling bussines ! [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img] Wacken: For example i have to wager 20.000 for the 1000$ bonus. I find a game with 2% house advantage and thus lose 800 on average while wagering the 20k and have an expected profit of 200 MANSION Paul N: Different countries different terminology, just wanted to be sure. No problem playing your wagering requirement in a game that offers a positive EV for the bonus after clearing the WR. Wacken: Thank you MANSION Paul N: thank you for the chat [/ QUOTE ] were you dropped as a child? thank god for natural selection |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|