![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
kit,
what are your thoughts on FT 200nl? which regulars give you the most trouble and why? |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
kit, what are your thoughts on FT 200nl? which regulars give you the most trouble and why? [/ QUOTE ] I don't have enough hands logged there to really comment thoroughly, but offhand MyNameIsBusto seems decent. There's a guy called I Luv Yu (sp?) with decent looking stats who might be decent but I haven't really played with him enough to say. I think the 200NL isn't very much harder than the 100NL game. On the contrary I've found a ton of good tables going every time I sat down to play there. I also like the 200NL game a lot more because it feels like I'm playing real poker, with some squeezing and floating and bluffing, 2nd barrelling and 3-betting preflop, whereas I hardly ever do those things at 100NL. Maybe I'm getting too fancy for my own good. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
kit, what are your thoughts on FT 200nl? which regulars give you the most trouble and why? [/ QUOTE ] I just looked at my datamined PT stats and I have Freak Sho, HORRIBLEPOSE, TyroneBiggums, maytown and DianaAA as my biggest winners (but only over about 2k hands each). Obviously that doesn't say anything about how good they are. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] kit, what are your thoughts on FT 200nl? which regulars give you the most trouble and why? [/ QUOTE ] I just looked at my datamined PT stats and I have Freak Sho, HORRIBLEPOSE, TyroneBiggums, maytown and DianaAA as my biggest winners (but only over about 2k hands each). Obviously that doesn't say anything about how good they are. [/ QUOTE ] eh. IMO, my toughest competition is 'MyNameIsBusto', 'PTYOBBD' or something like that, and naknak. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|