|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: I would . . . | |||
| fold |
   
|
2 | 16.67% |
| limp |
  
|
5 | 41.67% |
| raise 3x |
  
|
4 | 33.33% |
| raise some other amount |
  
|
1 | 8.33% |
| Voters: 12. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
08-29-2006, 07:06 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OT: The Throwing vs Hitting Tennis Bet
[ QUOTE ]
Isn't the thrower going to have to throw a tennis ball 250-500 times to win a 2-3 set match? Maybe more even if the strategy depends on unforced errors from the opponent. I don't think throwing the ball with any pace is an option. [/ QUOTE ] But you don't need to be whipping fastballs for all of those throws. I do agree that if the raquest side can stretch the game out, the catcher doesn't stand a chance. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Threaded Mode