![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] yes! if your going to tease, BOTH teams need to be gaining the 3 and the 7 (99% of the time, the other 1% you are getting the 1/2 off the 3) if not, flat bet. [/ QUOTE ] Not if the flat bets are less +EV than the tease. [/ QUOTE ] Exactly right. I think his argument is if all bets are equally +EV, don't waste your time with the tease, but maybe I misunderstood. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] yes! if your going to tease, BOTH teams need to be gaining the 3 and the 7 (99% of the time, the other 1% you are getting the 1/2 off the 3) if not, flat bet. [/ QUOTE ] Not if the flat bets are less +EV than the tease. [/ QUOTE ] Exactly right. I think his argument is if all bets are equally +EV, don't waste your time with the tease, but maybe I misunderstood. [/ QUOTE ] The ONLY way a teaser is +EV is if BOTH teams cross the 3 and ther 7. Thats it, plain and simple. If you going to argue otherwise, then go ahead. Time will (and has) prove(en) you wrong. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] yes! if your going to tease, BOTH teams need to be gaining the 3 and the 7 (99% of the time, the other 1% you are getting the 1/2 off the 3) if not, flat bet. [/ QUOTE ] Not if the flat bets are less +EV than the tease. [/ QUOTE ] Exactly right. I think his argument is if all bets are equally +EV, don't waste your time with the tease, but maybe I misunderstood. [/ QUOTE ] The ONLY way a teaser is +EV is if BOTH teams cross the 3 and ther 7. Thats it, plain and simple. If you going to argue otherwise, then go ahead. Time will (and has) prove(en) you wrong. [/ QUOTE ] To wrap this up in a short and sweet manner, do you see any value to diversifying risk through teasing in the manner described (one play capturing 3/7, the other stronger ATS play capturing only 7/10)? |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] yes! if your going to tease, BOTH teams need to be gaining the 3 and the 7 (99% of the time, the other 1% you are getting the 1/2 off the 3) if not, flat bet. [/ QUOTE ] Not if the flat bets are less +EV than the tease. [/ QUOTE ] Exactly right. I think his argument is if all bets are equally +EV, don't waste your time with the tease, but maybe I misunderstood. [/ QUOTE ] The ONLY way a teaser is +EV is if BOTH teams cross the 3 and ther 7. Thats it, plain and simple. If you going to argue otherwise, then go ahead. Time will (and has) prove(en) you wrong. [/ QUOTE ] To wrap this up in a short and sweet manner, do you see any value to diversifying risk through teasing in the manner described (one play capturing 3/7, the other stronger ATS play capturing only 7/10)? [/ QUOTE ] No. The 3 is the foundation of the play. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
To wrap this up in a short and sweet manner, do you see any value to diversifying risk through teasing in the manner described (one play capturing 3/7, the other stronger ATS play capturing only 7/10)? [/ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] No. The 3 is the foundation of the play. [/ QUOTE ] Very good and thank you for the mental gymnastics. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|