Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Limit

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 10-10-2005, 02:17 AM
mmbt0ne mmbt0ne is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Back in ATL
Posts: 12,169
Default Re: Foxwooods 20/40: JTs hand

</font><blockquote><font class="small">En réponse à:</font><hr />
</font><blockquote><font class="small">En réponse à:</font><hr />
I sort of hate this raise.

[/ QUOTE ]
why?

[/ QUOTE ]

Given his hand range, you open yourself up way too much to a 3-bet.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-10-2005, 02:36 AM
Hobbs. Hobbs. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Not Boston
Posts: 5,095
Default Re: Foxwooods 20/40: JTs hand

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I sort of hate this raise.

[/ QUOTE ]
why?

[/ QUOTE ]

Given his hand range, you open yourself up way too much to a 3-bet.

[/ QUOTE ]
This guy was the type of live player that wouldn't put in 3 bets with less than two pair.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-10-2005, 03:21 AM
klonpucko klonpucko is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 820
Default Re: Foxwooods 20/40: JTs hand

why not just do the freecard raise?
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-10-2005, 02:40 PM
ErrantNight ErrantNight is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Apologizing to the Queen Mary
Posts: 3,295
Default Re: Foxwooods 20/40: JTs hand

do you think you're picking up any fold equity here?

cuz I don't.

whatever you gain you lose the times you're wrong about your "never get 3-bet" theory.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-10-2005, 02:48 PM
Fat Nicky Fat Nicky is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: StartWeight-260, Current-238
Posts: 5,017
Default Re: Foxwooods 20/40: JTs hand

[ QUOTE ]
I am going to very rarely get 3-bet by an over pair in this game. Live games tend to play more passive on big streets.

[/ QUOTE ]

So what is your plan if you don't get 3-bet, and he checks to you on the river when a blank falls?? Are you taking a stab at the pot since J high is surely no good??
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 10-10-2005, 02:53 PM
Hobbs. Hobbs. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Not Boston
Posts: 5,095
Default Re: Foxwooods 20/40: JTs hand

[ QUOTE ]
do you think you're picking up any fold equity here?

cuz I don't.

whatever you gain you lose the times you're wrong about your "never get 3-bet" theory.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think I actually do have some FE against AK, but I was unsure how often he leads the turn with AK UI here. Considering my equity in this pot I only need to get him to fold AK some small portion of the time to make this profitable.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 10-10-2005, 02:54 PM
Hobbs. Hobbs. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Not Boston
Posts: 5,095
Default Re: Foxwooods 20/40: JTs hand

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I am going to very rarely get 3-bet by an over pair in this game. Live games tend to play more passive on big streets.

[/ QUOTE ]

So what is your plan if you don't get 3-bet, and he checks to you on the river when a blank falls?? Are you taking a stab at the pot since J high is surely no good??

[/ QUOTE ]

I was planning on giving up UI on the river if called on the turn.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 10-10-2005, 03:30 PM
W. Deranged W. Deranged is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Macro Miserable
Posts: 5,368
Default Re: Foxwooods 20/40: JTs hand

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Nobody has mentioned the percentage of times he has AA-QQ and 3bets you.

[/ QUOTE ]

I am going to very rarely get 3-bet by an over pair in this game. Live games tend to play more passive on big streets.

[/ QUOTE ]

Two other things to consider (I like Hobb's idea here...):

1. Hobbs was playing like the Foxwoods 20/40 version of the DERB, and couldn't possibly miss his draw here... (the kid made like 7 racks or something...)

2. [Serious] The hands that Hobbs is likely to get three-bet by (the overpairs primarily) are hands that Hobbs has at least 13, and usually 15, outs against. Since he's hitting so much of the time here, getting three-bet is not nearly as bad as it would be if he had only a flush draw or something like that. Each bet that goes in is costing him like 1/6 of a BB, which is not a particularly steep price considering the size of the pot at this point. If we realize that Hobbs is risking somewhere between 1/6 and 1/3 of a BB on his raise here (depending on whether he get's three-bet), I think it's safe to say on average the "cost" of Hobb's raise is something like .2-.25 BB (remember, villain is passive). In a pot that has reached 5 BB already, Hobbs only needs to be right here like 1 in 20 times or even less to make this raise correct. Hobbs is likely to be up against AK at least some significant portion of the time here, and if villain folds even reasonably often I think it's clear we'll get a fold at least the necessary 5% of the time. Add in the metagame value and so on and I like this a lot.

3. I kind of prefer this line to the "raise-the-flop-for-a-free-card" line because that line is very unlikely to get us to defeat AK unimproved. A loose passive opponent like this will probably call the flop raise, and then if we take a free card we're going to have a very hard time getting our opponent to lay down anything, including AK unimproved, on the river. (Indeed, a river bluff at that point on our part would be very imprudent in what would be small pot). We're almost certainly getting three-bet on the flop by if villain has an overpair, and so most of the time raising the flop does nothing.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 10-10-2005, 05:00 PM
Hobbs. Hobbs. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Not Boston
Posts: 5,095
Default Re: Foxwooods 20/40: JTs hand

[ QUOTE ]
I think this hand is much easier to play if you raise the flop.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think raising this flop is bad as I will get 3-bet on this street by overpairs a lot of the time. Also AK is not going to fold to a flop raise and thus I'm commited to putting a turn bet rather than taking a free card (this is of course the times I am not 3-bet).
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 10-11-2005, 06:32 AM
ErrantNight ErrantNight is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Apologizing to the Queen Mary
Posts: 3,295
Default Re: Foxwooods 20/40: JTs hand

but sometimes you get 3-bet. believe it or not. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.