Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Sporting Events

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-20-2006, 03:11 PM
Jack of Arcades Jack of Arcades is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 13,859
Default Re: Skip Bayless is a douchebag

a) Bayless is a douchebag, duh. b) tech, you are so wrong.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-20-2006, 03:16 PM
tech tech is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Sports betting
Posts: 2,041
Default Re: Skip Bayless is a douchebag

[ QUOTE ]
tech, you are so wrong.

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't have anything against Seattle personally. I actually sort of like the Seahawks as a fan. But as a bettor, Seattle is one of the most overrated teams I can remember. They have been extraordinarily lucky (as Bayless said).
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-20-2006, 03:25 PM
Jack of Arcades Jack of Arcades is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 13,859
Default Re: Skip Bayless is a douchebag

Overrated by who?

edit: can't be the books. they're only favored by 3.5 at pinnacle.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-20-2006, 03:48 PM
tech tech is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Sports betting
Posts: 2,041
Default Re: Skip Bayless is a douchebag

[ QUOTE ]
can't be the books. they're only favored by 3.5 at pinnacle.

[/ QUOTE ]

The line opened at 6.5 and 7 at some shops. It came crashing down quickly.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-20-2006, 06:35 PM
Jack of Arcades Jack of Arcades is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 13,859
Default Re: Skip Bayless is a douchebag

Why did it "[come] crashing down quickly"? Are you saying a lot of money came down on the side of Carolina? If so, I don't see how Seattle can be OVERrated.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-20-2006, 07:04 PM
Jack of Arcades Jack of Arcades is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 13,859
Default Re: Skip Bayless is a douchebag

Oh, I found your analysis in the SEA/WAS game thread in the SB Forum. Let's see...

[ QUOTE ]
Niners, Niners, Rams, Rams, Cards, Cards, Texans, Titans -- games against division II teams don't count

[/ QUOTE ]

There are legitimate reasons for discounting certain games in an analysis, such as an injury to a key player (see: Tommy Maddox) or how long ago a game was (outcomes of games from weeks 1-5 don't have much to do with outcomes of games right now). However, performance against bad teams is just as important as performance against good teams in predicting future outcomes.

[ QUOTE ]
Indy -- Seattle would not have won if Indy had cared

[/ QUOTE ]

Seattle dominated Indy's OL just like SD and PIT did, and they shut down Edgerrin James pretty effectively. Or did Edgerrin James not care?

[ QUOTE ]
Dallas, NY Giants -- flukes; Seattle should have lost both

[/ QUOTE ]

Seattle did not have their starting wide receiver in any game, and they didn't even have their #2 in the Dallas game. Darrell Jackson against the tough Washington defense? 9 catchers for 143 yards.

Furthermore, everyone seems to forget the questionable calls on two New York Giant touchdowns. The game probably should have never made it to overtime.

[ QUOTE ]
Philly -- Philly was completely done by that point

[/ QUOTE ]

And they got baked by 42 points. The same team took the Giants to OT, beat St. Louis, and lead Washington in the fourth quarter. However, they were completely done by that point, so beating them by 42 is not impressive in the slightest.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.