Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > High Stakes

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-09-2006, 01:08 PM
anacrime anacrime is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Anaheim/LBC
Posts: 1,023
Default Re: 25-50 NL Trips river decision

[ QUOTE ]
Should I have bet the river, and if so, how much?

[/ QUOTE ]You did bet the river, which is why I think it's a fold. This is hardly ever a bluff.

I like check/calling better. It allows us to see a showdown and gives villain a chance to bluff. I don't think villain will call a reasonable bet on the river without at T or better, though that's hardly worth much since we don't have reads.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-09-2006, 02:11 PM
Slider Slider is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: StackTheFish
Posts: 3,879
Default Re: 25-50 NL Trips river decision

Only a certain type of player will have the 'audacity' to bluff raise that river 'knowing' that you don't have a T.

His raise on the river clearly shows he's not afraid of the T. In fact, he's probably hoping you have a T here. You're beat by way too many hands here. I check call a reasonable bet here because you do have showdown value and your opponent isn't calling a bet with a [censored] hand like a pair of sixes.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-10-2006, 02:34 AM
El Diablo El Diablo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 33,802
Default Re: 25-50 NL Trips river decision

Ikke,

Betting is far, far superior to checking on the river.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-10-2006, 03:57 AM
Ikke Ikke is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 344
Default Re: 25-50 NL Trips river decision

Hey Diablo,

Like many of us former limit junkies, I'm trying to make the switch to NL, so if you could expand a bit on your thoughts on this hand it would be nice.

On the river I chose to bet 1300, mainly because of two reasons: It would leave him with about one pot-size raise, so if he decides to bluf it will be for about his stack (his stack was only slightly more than mine) and I thought an 80-90% potbet would also refrain him from bluffing/raising me with weaker hands.

OTOH, I think if I would have bet less, say half the pot (about 800), I could get paid off with more hands. But, he also might be more inclined to bluf, or to raise hands that he thinks are the best, but are not. So far in the hand, since I've been playing relatively tight, I think I mainly represented an overpair. He might think he could push me off that, and a smallish river bet will likely confirm his read IMO.

So what do you think? How much should I have bet the river and why? Should I have been more creative somewhere else in the hand (like for instance c/r turn)? In this case: fold river (is this an easy decision)?

Thanks in advance for answering.

Also, I will be in Vegas from july 18th. Any chance you will be there?

Regards
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.