the state of the forum

[pryor15]

[ QUOTE ]
Thanks for ignoring the history content. Pretentious reviews, indeed.

[/ QUOTE ]

my bad. the history content, while unread by me, is by all accounts fantastic and should be encouraged.

i'm more a historical figures type myself, with a focus on society's trends, etc, etc, but a good battle post is always a good thing.

[LittleOldLady]

[ QUOTE ]
Thanks for ignoring the history content. Pretentious reviews, indeed.

[/ QUOTE ]

I hope you found the website I posted in the Agincourt thread useful....

[pryor15]

thanks all for your kind words and support. looks like i wasn't as out of touch with popular opinion as i suspected.

[diebitter]

If anyone saw who ninja-bumped this thread, please let me know by pm.

[pryor15]

[ QUOTE ]
If anyone saw who ninja-bumped this thread, please let me know by pm.

[/ QUOTE ]

it wasn't me

[katyseagull]

lol. I thought it was probably Pryor.

[dcasper70]

Not me, but I do find the state of TQZ a year ago to be an interesting read.

good times....

[katyseagull]

dcasper,

I think we are due a new thread by you. Please start thinking of a good topic.

If you can't decide, feel free to run a few by us and we will give you feedback on which ones we think are any good.

[pryor15]

i should point out that while i didn't ninja-bump it, a lot of the points i made still hold true, and the timing of the ninja-bump is probably a good one

[diebitter]

I don't see this forum at all like your OP any more, and I like it better how it is now than what you propose in there.


I like the weekend games, the occasional light thread. It's not like they crowd out the deeper longer threads.

I personally think we've got a great medium.


I do wish some of the regulars would start more threads though.

Do people have anxieties about starting threads in here, may I ask?