NL100 KQ top pair

[SvensHorse]

Actually i dont really know, if i'M ahead on the river the most time.

[delta k]

[ QUOTE ]
Actually i dont really know, if i'M ahead on the river the most time.

[/ QUOTE ]

Thats because you didn't tell us about villian. He's paassive, ok...but loose/tight? Will he calls with hands we beat? That's what we need to know.

[matv]

this is a blocking bet it looks quite standard to me, i insta-muck even if im min raised

[delta k]

[ QUOTE ]
this is a blocking bet it looks quite standard to me, i insta-muck even if im min raised

[/ QUOTE ]

Of course it is. But villian is passive. We dont need to block if he is not going to bet UNLESS he has us beat.

[matv]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
this is a blocking bet it looks quite standard to me, i insta-muck even if im min raised

[/ QUOTE ]

Of course it is. But villian is passive. We dont need to block if he is not going to bet UNLESS he has us beat.

[/ QUOTE ]

good point, didnt think of this. though....do we know this?

[delta k]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
this is a blocking bet it looks quite standard to me, i insta-muck even if im min raised

[/ QUOTE ]

Of course it is. But villian is passive. We dont need to block if he is not going to bet UNLESS he has us beat.

[/ QUOTE ]

good point, didnt think of this. though....do we know this?

[/ QUOTE ]

OP says villian is passive, that's all we know....

[matv]

oh he has 0.6 aggression factor yer we can prob check-fold.

EDIT: i still calla really weak bet

[begbie100]

[ QUOTE ]

Of course it is. But villian is passive. We dont need to block if he is not going to bet UNLESS he has us beat.

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree, it's safe to just check against villain with 0.6 aggression factor, 80% of the time he just checks behind, if he bets more than 1/3 pot, you can safely fold tpgk.